- Mac pro vs imac for video editing pro#
- Mac pro vs imac for video editing software#
- Mac pro vs imac for video editing Pc#
Mac pro vs imac for video editing pro#
What components do I get for the money?Īt the top of the Macintosh tree is the company’s Mac Pro range.
In either case, you’ll want a GPU to match your creative ambitions. Second, you might later decide to switch program to something that’s more GPU-dependent, like DaVinci Resolve. First, you might want the flexibility to bring VFX elements into your workflow. That said, it’s probably unwise to hobble your machine with an inferior card, especially if you’re investing thousands of pounds into it.
Mac pro vs imac for video editing software#
Unless you’re working with visual effects or with certain types of software built to take advantage of the GPU, your graphics card can take a back seat in your video-editing build. Similarly, large videos eat up enormous amounts of storage space, which makes investing in storage capacity super-important. The investment in 64GB or even more can yield worthwhile improvements for some professionals. 16GB of RAM should be considered a minimum for serious work. The more RAM you have, the more video you’ll be able to deal with at any given time. If you don’t have enough, your computer will need to create virtual memory on your storage drive, which will slow things down to a crawl. When you’re editing 4K or even 8K video, you need lots of RAM to juggle all that data. Allocating more of your budget to a processor with eight, 16 or even 64 cores will yield an improvement in performance roughly proportional to the amount you’re spending. Video-editing software tends to be optimised to take advantage of multiple cores.
Mac pro vs imac for video editing Pc#
With the Ultra 9 editing PC that features an AMD Ryzen 9 CPUĬonfigure yours today Parallel processing Whichever system you opt for, the graphics card is actually among the least important components – what matters more are the CPU and RAM. Video Editing versus Gamesīefore we delve into the pros and cons of PCs and modern iMacs, it’s worth looking at what’s actually important when it comes to video editing PCs. It’s a bit like the debate of whether pineapple should go on a pizza: however strong the opinion, the choice is entirely subjective, and it has a lot more to do with familiarity, aesthetics, and personal philosophy than component lists and benchmarks. Mac versus PC is a debate that’s been raging in certain darkened corners of the internet for decades, and no conclusive victor has emerged. If you’ve spent several years acquainting yourself with the workflow of a given program, be it Logic Pro or Final Cut Pro, and you have every hotkey committed to muscle memory, you probably won’t want to make the transition to an entirely different way of doing things – at least, not without good reason. This might be the case for many reasons, but among the most compelling is familiarity. It shortens rendering times, makes interfaces more responsive, and generally makes for greater productivity.įor many content creators, the preferred platform is Apple’s macOS. But artists working with digital media will also benefit from having an amazing editing PC at their disposal. In the conclusion of the video, Max Tech said that if anyone is interested in doing multiple tasks, heavy editing, or wants to play games smoothly, they should definitely go for the M1 MacBook Pro.Most people who go to the trouble of assembling a powerful custom-built rig are going to be playing games. Max Tech called the takedown of the Intel chip a ‘slaughter-fest’. Other than these features, the M1 MacBook Pro beats the 16-inch in all of the other areas. The 16-inch MacBook Pro is better because it has more trackpad real estate, better speakers, a larger screen, and a slightly larger keyboard. The device can easily handle audio editing, video rendering, graphics, and image editing and is powered by Apple’s own silicon.
Thanks to the M1 chip’s power efficiency, it allows the 13-incher to run cool, and it has a battery that lasts much much longer than the 16-inch model.
The video does not sell the 16-inch Mac short, because it did knock the rival M1 MacBook Pro in graphics performance by 12.5% due to its strong AMD Radeon 5300M dedicated GPU, granted it did consume a lot of power to make this happen. As for the price, the M1 MacBook Pro starts at $1,499 CAD at retail, while the 16-inch MacBook starts at $2,999 CAD. In Geekbench 5, the 13-inch Mac benchmarks 69% higher than the Intel system in single-core processing, and 37% better in multi-core processing. The M1 MacBook Pro hit a remarkable 220 minutes/runs while the Intel i9-based Mac came in at 128.1 minutes/runs. The first performance test was for web browsing test.
0 kommentar(er)
